Hiring Challenge Poll
SHRM 2025 Talent Acquisition Survey reports that 75% of HR leaders say candidate quality is harder to source than candidate volume. Take this two question peer poll on your single biggest hiring blocker and your team size to see which constraint dominates among peers.
Last updated: May 2026
SHRM 2025 Talent Acquisition Survey reports that 75% of HR leaders say candidate quality is harder to source than candidate volume. Take this two question peer poll on your single biggest hiring blocker and your team size to see which constraint dominates among peers.
📊 Your visitors see this on your website. HR teams embed this tool on their careers page, candidates assess fit and you capture their profile data automatically. See plans →
↑ This is exactly what your website visitors see when you embed this tool. The only difference: their results are gated behind an email capture form, and every input is sent to your CRM.
Comparing static form deployments to interactive tool deployments surfaces a consistent pattern: businesses that replace static forms with interactive tools like this one see 3-5x more qualified leads, visitors volunteer their data because they get personalized results in return.
Embed This Poll on Your Website
Every visitor who uses your embedded poll becomes a qualified lead. Their inputs, results, and business data are captured and sent to your CRM, before you ever pick up the phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the hiring challenge poll measure?
It asks for the single biggest hiring constraint right now (candidate quality, candidate volume, time to fill, compensation, employer brand, internal alignment) and your team size. The result shows the peer pattern across these dimensions.
Why is candidate quality often harder than volume?
SHRM 2025 data shows 75% of HR leaders say quality is the binding constraint, not volume. ATS systems and inbound channels are good at producing applicant volume, but qualified, motivated, and culturally aligned candidates remain scarce in most roles.
How does this poll differ from a recruitment cost calculator?
A recruitment cost calculator quantifies what you spent. This poll is a peer pattern check, intentionally fast. Use the poll to identify the binding constraint, then use the cost calculator and benchmarks to size the problem.
What should I do if my hiring challenge does not match peer median?
A divergent answer is often a signal of a role specific or company specific issue. Compare your motion to peers in your size and stage band, then deep dive into the dimension you flagged before changing your hiring playbook.
Related Tools
Recruitment Cost Calculator
The average cost per hire in the US is $4,700 according to SHRM data. Enter your job ad spend, recruiter fees, interview hours, and onboarding costs to calculate the true cost of each hire. Compare your cost per hire against industry benchmarks by role and seniority.
Hiring Speed Calculator
Roles left open for 42 or more days cost businesses $500 per day in lost productivity according to SHRM data. Enter your recruitment data to calculate average time to hire and cost per hire. Compare against industry benchmarks and identify the bottlenecks slowing you down.
Hiring Plan Calculator
The average US hire takes 44 days to fill according to SHRM data. Enter your open roles, growth plans, and budget to forecast headcount needs, recruitment costs, and onboarding timelines across departments. Plan your hiring pipeline to avoid bottlenecks and budget overruns.
Are You Underpaid Poll
Payscale 2025 Compensation Best Practices data finds that 52% of employees feel underpaid, but only 18% have benchmarked. This three question peer poll captures role, region, and pay range to show where you sit against the peer band. Educational comparison only, not financial or compensation advice.
Employer Brand Benchmark
75% of job seekers consider employer brand before applying and strong brands reduce cost per hire by 50% according to LinkedIn data. Benchmark your employer brand across 8 dimensions including Glassdoor rating, careers page quality, EVP clarity, offer acceptance rate, and employee advocacy.
Return to Office Poll
Owl Labs 2025 State of Hybrid Work found that 64% of employees say they would actively look for a new job if forced fully back to office. Vote in this two question peer poll on your current arrangement and your ideal one to see where the peer median sits across remote, hybrid, and in office.